Alan K. Henderson's Weblog

HOME   |   BLOGGER PROFILE   |   BLOGROLL  MAP   |   HENDERSON  PRIZE   |   EMAIL

COMMENTS TEMPORARILY CLOSED - MIGRATING FROM HALOSCAN/ECHO TO DISQUS
Old comments migrated to Disqus, currently working outtechnical issues

Sunday, July 14, 2013

 
The Evidence Supports Zimmerman

Item one: New York Daily News reports, "The medical examiner found two injuries on Martin’s body: the fatal gunshot wound on his chest and broken skin on his knuckles, according to WFTV." If Zimmerman had assaulted Trayvon before Trayvon assaulted Zimmerman, the medical examiner would have found other injuries.

Item two: Zimmernam received multiple images to the head. According to Business Insider: "Forensic pathologist Vincent Di Maio...told jurors Tuesday he saw evidence of at least six impacts on Zimmerman's head. He also said those blows were likely the result of severe force, backing up Zimmerman's claims he killed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin in self-defense. The Blaze has photos of the injuries taken on the night of the shooting.

Item three: Trayvon was on top, according to forensic and eyewitness evidence. CBS reports Dr. DiMaio's testimony: "If you lean over someone, you notice the clothing tends to fall away from the chest..If instead you're lying on your back and someone shoots you, the clothing is going to be against your chest." According to the Las Vegas Sun, witness Jonathan Good testified that the guy in dark clothing (Trayvon) was on top of the guy in the red jacket (Zimmerman).

This combination of evidence is wildly inconsistent with the claim that Zimmerman instigated the attack. He couldn't have dealt first blows unless he pistol-whipped Trayvon's knuckles. He couldn't have had his head pounded into pavement if he'd shot Trayvon first. He wouldn't have given Trayvon the time to pound his head into concrete SIX TIMES (at least) if he'd simply pulled the gun on Trayvon before the scuffle began - and I have a hard time imagining anybody lunging at a guy who's just pulled a gun on him. Zimmerman's claim to self-defense is supported by powerful physical evidence and supported by at least one eyewitness.

Labels:




Site Meter


Blogger